Stalin's Soviet Paradox: the Illusion of Equality for Women
Evaluating the economic, political, and social consequences of Stalin’s domestic policies on Soviet women
This essay was written by Navya Bhambi: a high school student from Vietnam
Joseph Stalin's tenure as the leader of the Soviet Union marked a transformative period in society, with far-reaching implications for the status and rights of women. The objective of this essay is to evaluate the extent to which women gained from Stalin's domestic policies. Through an examination of the economic, political and social dimensions, a comprehensive analysis will be presented regarding the implemented policies and their consequences on the lives of women in the Soviet Union. Moreover, this essay will argue that, in essence, women experienced more hardships than benefits as a result of Stalin's domestic policies.
Marxist theory was seen to have both shaped policy towards women and, in part, accounted for its failure, according to (Molyneux, 1981). This essay will support that policies pertaining to women were ultimately ineffective. It will contend, nevertheless, that it was not Marxist theory that caused it, but rather Stalin himself.
Women in Stalin’s Russia significantly benefited from his economic policies. The government introduced incentives to promote women's participation in the workforce, such as free healthcare, accident insurance, increased availability of crèches, paid holidays, and "sitting" services in some factories. As a result, by 1939, women constituted a significant part of the workforce, with one-third of engineers, 79% of doctors, and 43% of the industrial workforce being women (Cantrell et al., 2013, pg 249-250). This portrays the significant and rapid impact of Stalin’s economic policies in the short-term. Women's roles in employment improved significantly, with more opportunities in various industries. Furthermore, state and workplace nurseries were established to support working mothers, and welfare reforms provided free health services and workplace accident insurance (Whitehead, 2023). This provided women with more security and flexibility in their management of both their professional and personal lives. Moreover, women were encouraged to break free from traditional domestic roles and actively contribute to industrial productivity (Adler, n.d.). The policies reflected the government's vision of creating an ideal society with equality for all, including women, and Soviet women achieved professional success and played active roles in the workforce, benefiting from the opportunities provided by Stalin's economic policies (Chatterjee, n.d.).
However, these economic advancements did not come without a cost; women also faced significant challenges and inequalities under Stalin’s regime. They often occupied lower positions in the workplace, faced discrimination, and had to balance work with domestic responsibilities. Women were disproportionately concentrated in lower-paying and less politically influential fields. The rapid industrialisation and urbanization of the 1930s burdened women, and they suffered from food shortages during the collectivization-induced famine (Ewing & Dyke, n.d.). Despite the government's intentions, women did not achieve true equality, and their burden of domestic responsibilities persisted. Thus, the overall impact of Stalin's economic policies on women was marked by disparities and limitations.
Interestingly, women in Stalin's Russia experienced notable societal gains as a result of his political policies. The Communist Party considered women equal to men and introduced tax breaks to incentivize larger families. “Women who had six or more children were paid 2,000 roubles per year for five years.” (Armstrong, n.d.). Policies aimed at increasing the workforce and promoting a higher birth rate were implemented, with the Women's Bureau (Zhenotdel) playing a pivotal role in shaping these initiatives. Led by prominent party members and feminists Alexandra Kollontai and Inessa Armand, the Women's Bureau worked towards female emancipation, advocating for easier divorce, contraception, and abortion availability (Evans & Jenkins, 2008, pg 300-302). Women's rights were further enhanced by reforms in the 1920s, including modifications to marriage laws and equal education. As a result, divorce was made easier (Whitehead, 2023). International Communist Woman's Day honored the contributions of women and promoted political activity (Ewing & Dyke, n.d.). These programs and policies show how Stalin's political measures gave women in Soviet society greater opportunities, benefits, and recognition.
Unfortunately, women in Stalin’s Russia also experienced several obstacles and difficulties as a result of his political policies. Women's membership in the Communist Party increased from 10% in 1917 to 12.8% in 1928, but it remained relatively low in the years after the Russian Revolution. Obstacles for women arose from Russian male chauvinism as well as traditional attitudes that prohibited active party participation. There were even incidents of women receiving abuse by their husbands for their involvement in party work (Corin & Fiehn, 2011, pg 286-291). Their voices were marginalized and they had little influence over decisions, therefore political equality remained distant (Adler, n.d.). Stalin's 1930s diminution of women's benefits and the Zhenotdel's elimination represented an abrupt shift against feminist ideals. Inequality, repression, and an erosion of women's rights and freedoms were the underlying effects of Stalin's political policy.
Women in Stalin’s Russia did witness benefits as a result of the social policies implemented. In 1926, common-law marriages were granted legal status and free advice on contraception (Whitehead, 2023). The Zhenotdel supported working moms by establishing childcare facilities and promoting women's education under the direction of feminist activists (Evans & Jenkins, 2008, p300-302). An example of this is the state‐run kindergartens. “Children were taken to the park to exercise in good weather whilst their mothers worked.” (Armstrong, n.d.). The emphasis was on achieving economic independence as a way to free women from conventional home responsibilities. The Bolsheviks, who saw conventional bourgeois marriage as a form of slavery, pressed for the socialization of domestic services and attempted to redefine the institution of marriage.
However, Stalin's social policies in the Soviet Union also brought about significant challenges and suffering for women. Their expectations of juggling employment and household duties put a strain on them, leaving little time for other interests or education (Cantrell et al., 2013, p249-250). "In capitalist societies, women in property-holding families reproduce heirs; women in working-class families reproduce generations of labor power for the system." - Karl Marx (Darbaidze & Niparishvili, 2023). This emphasizes that, under Stalin’s reign, Karl Marx’s perspective was starting to emerge. Furthermore, The Zhenotdel's dissolution in 1930 made women's support networks even less powerful and prevented them from advancing. Marriage was advocated and promiscuity, contraception, and abortion were discouraged as traditional views about women and family values resurfaced (Evans & Jenkins, 2008, p300-302). The negative consequences of these policies are evident in the statistics, which include high divorce rates as a result of pregnant women being abandoned and insufficient provision of services like childcare and public kitchens (Corin & Fiehn, 2011, p 286-291). The burden placed on women was exacerbated by a lingering presence of traditional gender norms and expectations, which weakened the intended reform of the “new family.” “Particularly under Stalin's regime, this ideal woman did not turn out exactly as planned. Instead of creating gender neutrality, women were not treated equally under the new laws. The attempts to create a new womanhood did change the way women were expected to behave, but they did not necessarily become the equal of their male counterparts” (Adler, n.d.). This highlights the, perhaps, unintended consequences of Stalin’s regime in shaping the ideal woman. Moreover, those who were unmarried had to pay higher taxes, adding to the burden already placed on those who weren't adhering to conventional marriage customs. Additionally, children born out of wedlock were deprived of their inheritance rights (Whitehead, 2023). These policies not only reinforced societal norms and stigmatized non-traditional family structures but also perpetuated the marginalization and economic vulnerability of unmarried women and their children.
In this essay, I have discussed the benefits and challenges that women faced through Stalin's domestic policies in the Soviet Union. While there were some gains, such as women's increased workforce participation and the efforts of the members of the Zhenotdel, it is important to acknowledge the prevalent discrimination and gender inequality that persisted throughout Stalin's regime. These limitations hindered the full realization of gender equality and undermined the progress made. Furthermore, the contradictory nature of Stalin's domestic policies ultimately resulted in a less-than-favorable scenario for the women of the USSR. Many of these policies were implemented for Stalin's own political and personal gain, rather than with genuine concern for the well-being and rights of women. As a result, the societal gains achieved were often overshadowed by the systemic challenges and the failure to address fundamental gender inequalities. Ultimately, Stalin's policies resulted in the suppression of women's voices and a regression in their rights and freedoms, undermining the ideals of gender equality that the Bolsheviks had initially sought to achieve.
Bibliography:
Adler, C. (n.d.). Women Under Stalin | Guided History. BU Blogs. Retrieved March 6, 2024, from https://blogs.bu.edu/guidedhistory/russia-and-its-empires/chelsea-adler/
Armstrong, B. (n.d.). Was life better or worse for women under Stalin? For a short time under Lenin, women had enjoyed a much freer status. In Marxis. JSTOR. Retrieved March 20, 2024, from https://historyrevision.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/was-life-better-or-worse-for-women-under-stalin.pdf
Cantrell, J., Smith, N., Smith, P., & Ennion, R. (2013). 20th Century History. Oxford University Press.
Chatterjee, C. (n.d.). Women at the Gates Gender and Industry in Stalin’s Russia. Reviews in History. Retrieved March 6, 2024, from https://reviews.history.ac.uk/review/315
Corin, C., & Fiehn, T. (2011). RUSSIA UNDER TSARISM AND COMMUNISM 1881-1953 (2nd ed.). Hodder Education.
Darbaidze, E., & Niparishvili, T. (2023, January 1). THE STATUS OF WOMEN IN THE SOVIET UNION. CEJSH. Retrieved March 7, 2024, from https://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_26881_jpgs_2023_1_01/c/articles-2196339.pdf.pdf
Evans, D., & Jenkins, J. (2008). Years of Russia, the USSR and the Collapse of Soviet Communism - (2nd ed.). Hodder Education.
Ewing, T., & Dyke, E. T. (n.d.). Long Teaching Module: Women and Stalinism, 1929-1939. World History Commons. Retrieved March 10, 2024, from https://worldhistorycommons.org/long-teaching-module-women-and-stalinism-1929-1939
Liu, C. (2019, August 29). Stalin’s “New Soviet Woman”. Scientific Research Publishing. Retrieved March 6, 2024, from https://www.scirp.org/pdf/SM_2019082815160727.pdf
Molyneux, M. (1981). Socialist Societies Old and New: Progress Towards Women’s Emancipation? Feminist Review, 8, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.2307/1394923
Varga-Harris, C. (2010, November 11). Gender and Housing in Soviet Russia: Private Life in a Public Space. Reviews in History. Retrieved March 7, 2024, from https://reviews.history.ac.uk/review/988
Whitehead, R. (2023, March 6). Stalin’s views towards Women. History: From One Student to Another. Retrieved March 6, 2024, from https://www.historyfromonestudenttoanother.com/a-level/a-level-european-history-1919-41/stalins-russia-1924-41/stalins-views-towards-women